Archive | Discussions

Potentials and Pitfalls of MOOC’s: Experiencing Massive Open Online Courses from the Instructor-as-Student Perspective

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
In the past few years many universities and colleges have begun offering Massive Open Online Courses, also known as MOOC’s. These enormous online courses with unlimited student enrollment have been touted as a way of bring education economically to the masses. The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) is looking at MOOC’s as one of the ways to expand access to higher education opportunities in the United States.

Some regard these online courses as ways of improving student learning outcomes and a natural extension of distance education; others view them as entirely disastrous for both students and instructors. Whether MOOC’s will transform e-learning or become a passing novelty remains to be seen.

To experience MOOC’s first hand the presenter, a long-time online student and online instructor, enrolled and completed several online courses offered by Coursera.org “with distinction.” Reasons for taking the courses included: brushing up on existing subject matter, observing teaching styles utilized in a MOOC, studying new fields, gaining inside student knowledge from taking massive open online courses and explore the potential for teaching MOOC’s.

This general session presentation will explore some of the potentials and pitfalls of MOOC’s from the instructor-as-student perspective.

In the discussion section participants will be invited to share and discuss their own experiences with MOOC’s either as students or as instructors.

Participants will also brainstorm on how these massive open online courses may be redefining the online education experience for both students and instructors.

Presenter(s)
Kirsti Dyer, Columbia College, California, USA
Kirsti_Dyer_64Dr. Kirsti A. Dyer MD, MS, FT is a physician, health educator, professor, online instructor, lecturer, author, and longtime online student. Dr. Dyer received her medical and master’s degrees from the University of California, Davis. Since having her two daughters, her focus has shifted from clinical practice to education, wellness, and health promotion.

Dr. Dyer has been using online course tools since developing an enhanced Nutrition Course for Columbia College in January 2005. Her Nutrition course has been fully online in Blackboard since Fall 2008. Dr. Dyer has been teaching an online graduate course in Grieving Family Systems for Madonna University since January 2007. She has also taught several online continuing education courses for Mount Ida as part of their National Center for Death Education program.

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.

 

Human Touch = Engaged Online Students

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
Online instructors first need to be engaged if they want their students engaged. Learn how “human touch” serves to get everyone engaged.

Human touch is really all about creating and maintaining relationships. When students sense a trusting, caring relationship on the part of their instructor, students begin to perceive that their online experience is as much about them, or even more so, than the curriculum, projects, and test results. Students feel that their instructor is trying to establish a warm, supportive relationship, their sense of belonging and engagement increases. That’s just human nature.

The presentation will highlight examples of “human touch” in online courses, including those used by the presenter who has taught well over 100 undergraduate and graduate online college courses since 2000.

Presenter(s)
John Thompson, Buffalo State College, Buffalo, NY, USA
John ThompsonDr. John Thompson is Associate Professor Emeritus at Buffalo State College, Buffalo, NY, USA. He also operates his own educational consulting business – Global Learning Institute, Inc. Although retired, Dr. Thompson continues to teach 100% online courses for several institutions of higher education. He has taught some 150 online courses since 2000. He enjoys the flexibility of teaching online from his home office at all hours of the day and night. Dr. Thompson has chaired conferences, done presentation and paper reviews for numerous conferences and publications, made presentations at numerous local to international conferences, and has authored many publications in his field. Prior to working in higher education, his career experience included working in urban, suburban, and rural schools as an elementary and secondary classroom teacher (general education and special education), curriculum coordinator, principal, and school superintendent. He also functioned as director of training for two state governments and director of a university-based computer training organization.

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Developing Courses and Programs Using Open Education Resources: Challenges and Opportunities

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
The cost of a college degree in the United States has increased over 1000% in the past 30 years (Jamrisko & Kolet, 2012), with Americans currently spending an estimated $450 billion dollars each year for post-secondary education. For many, student loans have been the only way to keep up with the increasing cost, and student loan debt is now over $1 trillion dollars (Kavoussi, 2012). Recognizing the need to decrease costs where possible, many colleges have turned to open source content since over $12 billion dollars is spent each year for textbooks. Open educational resources (OER), such as learning management systems (for example Moodle), free or inexpensive online textbooks (bookboon, Flat World Knowledge), supplemental study materials or courses (MIT Open Courseware, Coursera, Khan Academy), word processing tools such as AbiWord , as well as full productivity suites such as OpenOffice and LibreOffice (Giza, 2009), indeed help reduce out of pocket expenses. Curating these resources, however, for course and/or program development – while presenting a wonderful opportunity, is not without its challenges.

This presentation will provide a balanced discussion and interactive session around the challenges and opportunities in developing courses and programs using OER’s.

References:
Giza, B. (2009). The use of free, open-source, and web-based tools in education. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (pp. 1838-1842). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Jamrisko, M, & Kolet, I. (2012, Aug 15). Cost of college degree in U.S. oars 12 fold: Chart of the day. http://www.bloomberg.com
Kavoussi, B. (2012 Mar 22) Student loan debt hits $1 trillion, deemed ‘too big to fail’ by one Federal agency. http:/www.huffingtonpost.com

Presenter(s)
Trevor Belcher, Ashford University, Bristol, VA, USA
Trevor BelcherDr. Trevor Belcher is an Assistant Professor in Ashford’s College of Health, Human Services, and Science, where he teaches undergraduate psychology courses such as Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and the Capstone course. He holds his PhD and MS in Psychology from Capella University and a BS with a double major in Ministry and Theology from Mid-America Christian University. Over most of the past two decades, his educational and practical experience has allowed him the opportunity to serve in various capacities such as pastoral ministry (ten years), counseling, teaching, and administration. “For the past eight years, I have had the privilege of working and teaching at the University level. I have enjoyed and learned from every class. I love working with students and helping to make a difference in someone’s life.” Dr. Belcher was born in Warren, MI, reared in Kentucky. And currently lives in Virginia. He has been married for over two decades and has one son. In his spare time, he enjoys movies, spending time with his family, and trying to learn guitar.
Patricia Neely, Bridgepoint Education, Richlands, VA, USA
Bio coming soon!
Jan Tucker, Higher Learning Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
Bio coming soon!

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.

 

Exploring a Graduate-Level Mobile Technologies Course

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
This presentation will explore two instructors’ experiences while teaching a new graduate-level mobile technologies course at a Midwest university. This blended course was designed to inform educators and professionals about mobile technologies for teaching and learning. The instructors will share various mobile technologies and discuss some of the benefits and limitations of these tools. Participants will be encouraged to share and contribute their own experiences and best practices with mobile technologies in the university classroom.

Interactivity
Through the use of synchronous tools including whiteboard, chat, and polling, participants will be encouraged to share and contribute their own experiences and best practices with mobile technologies in the online and/or face-to-face classroom. As one example, participants will be asked to brainstorm ideas for using various mobile applications and technologies and share with the rest of the group. The collection of resources shared during the session will then be available as a take-away resource for all participants.

Presenter(s)
Jeffrey Geronimo, Elmhurst College, Elmhurst, IL, USA
Bio coming soon!
Cindy York, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA
Bio coming soon!

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Providing Instructional Design Support from a Distance

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
Although many university instructors in Indonesia are not digital natives, but some of them are highly motivated to apply technologies in their teaching. In order to provide quality learning by utilizing technology, these motivated instructors have to know about need analysis and instructional design. The majority of these instructors learn the need analysis and instructional design by doing their jobs and do not specifically from training in the college. In this presentation, I want to share my experience working from a distance with an instructor from the University of Malang in Indonesia to redesign a face-to-face social sciences class into a blended learning course. I am going to talk about my intervention in the conception stage and share the instructor report about the design and implementation.

I get to know the instructor of this course when she came to the East West Center as a participant of the civic education short course in the winter 2012. The instructor is a full time professor in the Faculty of Civic Education, University of Malang. Her specialization is in law education and civic engagement. For the fall 2013 (“Semester Gazal” which is the term used in Indonesia), the instructor was appointed to teach a coursed named The Insight of Social Sciences (Wawasan Ilmu Sosial). The main purpose of this course is to enhance students’ civic engagement and voluntary services in their local community. The course is a mandatory of the university and teach in all faculties (in the US we refer as department) at the same term by several instructors in different sections using the same syllabus which we redesigned prior to the implementation. However, the blended course section is applied only in the Faculty of Civic Education as a pilot project. The instructors taught 4 classes with approximately 40 students in a class. In the implementation, the instructor was supported by a senior student as a teaching assistant and the university information technology staff as a technology support. The pilot project is also achieved the university general funding for research and development and supported by the leadership in the university.

My primary role in this course is as an instructional designer and also content experts who worked with the instructor to redesign the course syllabus, contents, and suggest the organization of the website. I read through the initial syllabus of the course and provided suggestions to replace outdated contents and regrouping the theme. The instructor and I had synchronous meetings twice a week through either Skype calls or WizIQ virtual room. Moreover, we exchanged message using Facebook massagers regularly. In the discussion, I guide the instructor to analyze the need of learners and synchronizing the needs with the vision and mission of the university. The syllabus and course organization were then presented in a general meeting to the Dean and faculty members who teach the course in other sections. Suggestions from the Dean and other faculties were then incorporated in the final syllabus and the course organization.

At the first meeting of the class, the instructor conducted a survey to collect learners’ opinion about the benefit of the website and the blended course. The course was then delivered by combining the face-to-face meeting with the use of course website designed using WordPress, and Facebook group. The website is primarily used for content management, lesson planning and mapping, and occasional postings by learners and the instructor. Facebook group was used for the course discussion and delivered the course announcement. In the ongoing process, students and content experts were voluntary requested to evaluate the site, Facebook group, and the classroom instructions. At the end of the course, students were requested to fill out the post survey. Both students and instructors admitted that they mostly experiences positive learning experiences from the blended course. The instructor mentioned in her report that she is not merely learning from teaching and designing the course, but also learning from the students postings and portfolio.

Personally, I feel fortunate to be able to apply my learning as a doctoral student in the field of educational technology to the design of course in my home country. This application, further, confirmed that distance is not a constraint anymore for a collaborative project. In addition, with the proper use, simple technology can benefit the connection of educator and learner from different country. Advancement in educational technology enables their citizens to continue serving their country while they are staying abroad. Audiences who attend this presentation will take home a message about the potential of technology as a bridge to exchange knowledge and experience across nation and across the continent.

Presenter(s)
Hery The, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii
Hery TheFor more than 15 years, I have consistently performing successful teaching on various secondary and higher education institutions in the United States and Indonesia. As a result of my commitment to teaching, I have been awarded scholarships from several prestigious institutions, including the Ford Foundation, the East West Center, the Dennis Zvynakis Foundation, and the University of Hawai‘i Foundation. Recently, I defended my dissertation and will be graduating from the Educational Technology Program in the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa this May. My research interests are in multimodal learning environments, technology and language instruction, creative teaching in social sciences, and online-distance learning.
Siti Awaliyah, University of Malang, Malang, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Bio coming soon!

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Teaching based augmented reality and smartphones to promote learning motivation among middle school students

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
Educators’ attitudes toward wireless devices are mixed. Some teachers perceive them as a distraction to the educational process while others report the benefits of wireless devices to the learning process.

The aim of this study was to examine the extent to which middle school students’ use of smartphones for teaching affects students’ motivation. Moreover, it explored students’ attitudes toward the implementation of smartphones in education: the types of usage they implement and suggest and whether they think that smartphones should be implemented in schools at all. Students were found to be highly motivated compared to the control group; they expressed willingness to conduct such activities in the future and said they would be excited to develop an activity of their own.

Presenter(s)
Tami Seifert, Kibutzim College of Education, Tel Aviv, Israel
Tami SeifertHead, Computing Education Department, Director of Graduate Teacher Training Program, Faculty of Education at Kibutzim College of Education, Israel.
Teaches courses on innovative technologies in education, distance education, mobile education, and implementation of social networks in education.
Teaches toward a specialization certificate of online teaching.
Vicky Tshuva-Albo, Kibutzim College of Education, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Bio coming soon!

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Inter-Cultural Online Collaboration

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
This work focused on computer-mediated tutoring and its interaction with perceived cultural barriers. I was interested in how cultural background, cognitive load, and communicative involvement would interplay with a tutor’s instruction and a listener’s ease of comprehension. The results to this 5-experiment quantitative and qualitative study were quite complex, showing that users’ cognitive load threshold interacted with whether they perceived their conversational partner to be from the same or a different culture.

That is, those in the most difficult condition (challenging descriptions and perceived cross-cultural communication) actually put forth the least amount of effort of any group. Unsurprisingly, the difficulty manipulation in same-culture teacher/learner pairs caused the pairs to work harder. However, this same difficulty manipulation caused contrasting-cultural pairs to put forth less effort than those in the easy-manipulation group.

That is, when conversational participants were not from the same perceived cultural group, they did not try as hard in a difficult task. However, when they were in the same perceived cultural group, they did try harder in the harder task. Importantly, the cultural group manipulation was a deception, and all participants were from the same culture.

The findings of the study reiterate the well-established finding that Bruner’s scaffolding is indeed an important aspect of learning—when teachers and learners reach a load threshold, they will no longer be willing to try. The study also revealed interesting features of three theories of communication, which, at the time were thought to be at odds with each other. The dissertation showed that depending on the parameters of communicative setting, one or the other theory might be correct. The key parameters were cognitive load and perceived in-group/out-group status as manipulated by cultural preconceptions of the interlocutor (conversational partner).

One of these theories addressed in my work was Herbert Clark’s theory of common ground, whereby speakers and listeners try painstakingly to take each other’s perspectives into account. In this research, I demonstrate that such factors can amplify content difficulty, and need to be taken into consideration when determining how to scaffold tasks for learners.

Presenter(s)
  • Roxanne Raine, Hawaii Pacific University, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
Audience
Novice, Intermediate, Advanced, All Audiences

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Faculty Perceptions on the Benefits of Instructor Evaluation for Improved Online Facilitation.

Audience
Intermediate, Advanced
Session Description
This research study reviewed the Online Instructor Evaluation System (OIES) used by Park University’s Distance Learning program. The system is a peer/administrative means to evaluate adjunct instructors for effective online class facilitation. Online instructors who had been evaluated by the OIES were surveyed on their perspective of how the OIES impacted their online instruction. Both quantitative and qualitative results of the research survey indicated that online adjunct instructors perceived the OIES as a beneficial system to gauge and improve online facilitation.

Interactivity
Examples of the survey instrument and results will be proffered. As time allows, interactivity will include quizzing the audience members on their roles for their institutions, background in evaluation, and experiences with evaluation of online instructors.

Presenter(s)
Marthann Schulte, Park University, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
Marthann SchulteMarthann Schulte, PhD is an Associate Professor of Education at Park University, teaching and developing online courses for the graduate program in Adult Education. She is also the Coordinator of Online Faculty Evaluation and leads a team that oversees online instructor training, mentoring and evaluation. This evaluation team, which has created a number of unique, research based online training and evaluation programs, works with more than 500 online adjuncts per academic year. Marthann’s doctorate (PhD) is in Education, Curriculum and Instruction, from Kansas State University, where she focused on online learning and distance education modes. Marthann is a military spouse (Army) and works for Park University at a distance from Portsmouth, Virginia.

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Using Research Strategies at the Secondary Level to Actively Engage Learners Secondary Education

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
This workshop will present how to collect statistical data via the smart phone or computer. The presentation will accommodate either use of the PC or Mac. Presented will be the steps needed to set up teams using the application “Group Me.” A team leader is identified to compile the data. Members then collect data reporting to the leader who records the results on a frequency distribution table. Once data is compiled a meeting via Skype, IM, Wikis, Twitter or f2f to describe and discuss the statistical analysis most appropriate for the research project is then conducted. Data analysis via this venue allows for endless possibilities in relationship to statistical analysis. This technique is across grade levels and multidisciplinary.
Presenter(s)
Therese Kanai, University of Phoenix Online, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, USA
Therese_Kanai_64Aloha,
I have been involved in the field of education for over twenty years. Upon graduation from the University of Hawaii in Manoa I moved to Kailua-Kona, Hawaii and was a substitute teacher. It was at that point in time that I decided that working with children was my passion. I attended UH Hilo earning my secondary teaching certification in mathematics and then received my MA in Education from Heritage College. I earned a Ph.D. in Education from Walden University. Most recently I have taken 18 graduate units in Communications.

While working on my degrees I continued to teach taking on responsibilities as head class advisor, started a G/T program, designed a network, graduated from the DOE T3 program, and served as the Mathematics Department Chairperson. l helped to open a new high school serving as the Technology Coordinator and Registrar. I also taught Special Education and was a Title 1 administrator. Currently I teach Online at the post-graduate level and am focusing on teaching and publishing. This is such an exciting field and Online education is the way for the future.

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.

 

Teaching the Teachers: Tips for Training and Preparing Faculty for Course Development

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
Designing online and hybrid courses requires dedication to the subject matter, a passion for teaching, and attention to detail. Our interactive presentation will illustrate the tips we’ve gathered as we help faculty members through this process. We will demonstrate the course mapping process we employ, the best practices we’ve learned through trial and error and by gathering faculty feedback, and the step-by-step procedure used to ensure our faculty create quality, polished, and comprehensive courses that are sure to engage our students. Come prepared to discuss your own thoughts on faculty development and course development.

Interactivity
Participants will help to design a short course map during the session by offering their ideas on learning outcomes, competencies, assessments, and learning activities. The presenters will put the map together and share the finished product with the participants once completed.

Presenter(s)
Jen Propp, Elmhurst College, Elmhurst, IL, USA
Jen ProppI have been working in higher education for 15 years, first as an English Professor and then as a Faculty Developer. I have a master’s degree in English with a focus on teaching college writing and am in the final stages of my doctoral work in higher education and organizational change.
Donna Liljegren, Elmhurst College, Elmhurst, IL, USA
Donna Gardner LiljegrenDonna Gardner Liljegren is Director of the Elmhurst College Online Center and Manager, Instructional Support for the School for Professional Studies of Elmhurst College. In these roles she is responsible for the administration and growth of the Online Center as well as instructional support, including faculty recruiting and development, for online, onsite, and hybrid programs in the School for Professional Studies. She has worked in higher education for 22 years and distance learning for 17 years in both faculty and executive leadership roles. Her experiences have included for-profit and private universities. Dr. Liljegren earned BA and MA degrees in English from Governors State University and an Ed.D. in Adult Education from Nova Southeastern University.

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Produced by LearningTimes