A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
The Gen Y and Gen Z learners expect courses to encourage them creatively, while promoting opportunities to think and analyze the content through the use of new technologies. Implementation of gamification in courses proves to re-energize learners, create healthy competition, and increase learning engagement, while at the same time, adding some excitement and fun to the online classroom. Online professors need to be aware of gamification and its impact on students to successfully facilitate and manage “gamified” courses.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.
Some regard these online courses as ways of improving student learning outcomes and a natural extension of distance education; others view them as entirely disastrous for both students and instructors. Whether MOOC’s will transform e-learning or become a passing novelty remains to be seen.
To experience MOOC’s first hand the presenter, a long-time online student and online instructor, enrolled and completed several online courses offered by Coursera.org “with distinction.” Reasons for taking the courses included: brushing up on existing subject matter, observing teaching styles utilized in a MOOC, studying new fields, gaining inside student knowledge from taking massive open online courses and explore the potential for teaching MOOC’s.
This general session presentation will explore some of the potentials and pitfalls of MOOC’s from the instructor-as-student perspective.
In the discussion section participants will be invited to share and discuss their own experiences with MOOC’s either as students or as instructors.
Participants will also brainstorm on how these massive open online courses may be redefining the online education experience for both students and instructors.
Dr. Dyer has been using online course tools since developing an enhanced Nutrition Course for Columbia College in January 2005. Her Nutrition course has been fully online in Blackboard since Fall 2008. Dr. Dyer has been teaching an online graduate course in Grieving Family Systems for Madonna University since January 2007. She has also taught several online continuing education courses for Mount Ida as part of their National Center for Death Education program.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.
Human touch is really all about creating and maintaining relationships. When students sense a trusting, caring relationship on the part of their instructor, students begin to perceive that their online experience is as much about them, or even more so, than the curriculum, projects, and test results. Students feel that their instructor is trying to establish a warm, supportive relationship, their sense of belonging and engagement increases. That’s just human nature.
The presentation will highlight examples of “human touch” in online courses, including those used by the presenter who has taught well over 100 undergraduate and graduate online college courses since 2000.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
This presentation will provide a balanced discussion and interactive session around the challenges and opportunities in developing courses and programs using OER’s.
References:
Giza, B. (2009). The use of free, open-source, and web-based tools in education. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (pp. 1838-1842). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Jamrisko, M, & Kolet, I. (2012, Aug 15). Cost of college degree in U.S. oars 12 fold: Chart of the day. http://www.bloomberg.com
Kavoussi, B. (2012 Mar 22) Student loan debt hits $1 trillion, deemed ‘too big to fail’ by one Federal agency. http:/www.huffingtonpost.com
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.
Interactivity
Through the use of synchronous tools including whiteboard, chat, and polling, participants will be encouraged to share and contribute their own experiences and best practices with mobile technologies in the online and/or face-to-face classroom. As one example, participants will be asked to brainstorm ideas for using various mobile applications and technologies and share with the rest of the group. The collection of resources shared during the session will then be available as a take-away resource for all participants.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
I get to know the instructor of this course when she came to the East West Center as a participant of the civic education short course in the winter 2012. The instructor is a full time professor in the Faculty of Civic Education, University of Malang. Her specialization is in law education and civic engagement. For the fall 2013 (“Semester Gazal” which is the term used in Indonesia), the instructor was appointed to teach a coursed named The Insight of Social Sciences (Wawasan Ilmu Sosial). The main purpose of this course is to enhance students’ civic engagement and voluntary services in their local community. The course is a mandatory of the university and teach in all faculties (in the US we refer as department) at the same term by several instructors in different sections using the same syllabus which we redesigned prior to the implementation. However, the blended course section is applied only in the Faculty of Civic Education as a pilot project. The instructors taught 4 classes with approximately 40 students in a class. In the implementation, the instructor was supported by a senior student as a teaching assistant and the university information technology staff as a technology support. The pilot project is also achieved the university general funding for research and development and supported by the leadership in the university.
My primary role in this course is as an instructional designer and also content experts who worked with the instructor to redesign the course syllabus, contents, and suggest the organization of the website. I read through the initial syllabus of the course and provided suggestions to replace outdated contents and regrouping the theme. The instructor and I had synchronous meetings twice a week through either Skype calls or WizIQ virtual room. Moreover, we exchanged message using Facebook massagers regularly. In the discussion, I guide the instructor to analyze the need of learners and synchronizing the needs with the vision and mission of the university. The syllabus and course organization were then presented in a general meeting to the Dean and faculty members who teach the course in other sections. Suggestions from the Dean and other faculties were then incorporated in the final syllabus and the course organization.
At the first meeting of the class, the instructor conducted a survey to collect learners’ opinion about the benefit of the website and the blended course. The course was then delivered by combining the face-to-face meeting with the use of course website designed using WordPress, and Facebook group. The website is primarily used for content management, lesson planning and mapping, and occasional postings by learners and the instructor. Facebook group was used for the course discussion and delivered the course announcement. In the ongoing process, students and content experts were voluntary requested to evaluate the site, Facebook group, and the classroom instructions. At the end of the course, students were requested to fill out the post survey. Both students and instructors admitted that they mostly experiences positive learning experiences from the blended course. The instructor mentioned in her report that she is not merely learning from teaching and designing the course, but also learning from the students postings and portfolio.
Personally, I feel fortunate to be able to apply my learning as a doctoral student in the field of educational technology to the design of course in my home country. This application, further, confirmed that distance is not a constraint anymore for a collaborative project. In addition, with the proper use, simple technology can benefit the connection of educator and learner from different country. Advancement in educational technology enables their citizens to continue serving their country while they are staying abroad. Audiences who attend this presentation will take home a message about the potential of technology as a bridge to exchange knowledge and experience across nation and across the continent.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
The aim of this study was to examine the extent to which middle school students’ use of smartphones for teaching affects students’ motivation. Moreover, it explored students’ attitudes toward the implementation of smartphones in education: the types of usage they implement and suggest and whether they think that smartphones should be implemented in schools at all. Students were found to be highly motivated compared to the control group; they expressed willingness to conduct such activities in the future and said they would be excited to develop an activity of their own.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
That is, those in the most difficult condition (challenging descriptions and perceived cross-cultural communication) actually put forth the least amount of effort of any group. Unsurprisingly, the difficulty manipulation in same-culture teacher/learner pairs caused the pairs to work harder. However, this same difficulty manipulation caused contrasting-cultural pairs to put forth less effort than those in the easy-manipulation group.
That is, when conversational participants were not from the same perceived cultural group, they did not try as hard in a difficult task. However, when they were in the same perceived cultural group, they did try harder in the harder task. Importantly, the cultural group manipulation was a deception, and all participants were from the same culture.
The findings of the study reiterate the well-established finding that Bruner’s scaffolding is indeed an important aspect of learning—when teachers and learners reach a load threshold, they will no longer be willing to try. The study also revealed interesting features of three theories of communication, which, at the time were thought to be at odds with each other. The dissertation showed that depending on the parameters of communicative setting, one or the other theory might be correct. The key parameters were cognitive load and perceived in-group/out-group status as manipulated by cultural preconceptions of the interlocutor (conversational partner).
One of these theories addressed in my work was Herbert Clark’s theory of common ground, whereby speakers and listeners try painstakingly to take each other’s perspectives into account. In this research, I demonstrate that such factors can amplify content difficulty, and need to be taken into consideration when determining how to scaffold tasks for learners.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.