Archive | Archive

Signing on

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
Semiotics comprises the study and scientific analysis of meaning-making. Late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century theoreticians proposed three elements comprising this analysis: sign, signifier, and signified. But while these three have retained for more than a century their theoretical denotations as “word”, “sound”, and “meaning” in standard studies of communication, new media pictorial symbol-dependence is provoking a re-interpretation, if not a broadening, of the sign and its two composites. Although research continues to demonstrate the value of retaining the sign-signifier-signified union, increased dependence upon Web 2.0-style twenty-first century tools for quick and simple cross-cultural interaction may be generating both a shift in significance that favors the visual and an expanded messaging process that shares features with the communication processes favored by other creatures in our biosphere. Moreover, in encouraging this new Web 2.0 dependence, educators must at once cultivate the communicative and avoid the ambiguous. To do this, we must first attend to the original, “classical” meanings of the sign-signifier-signified triad, then note what the triad has to do with twenty-first century Web 2.0 messaging, and finally discern how real or perceived shifts in the meanings of sign, signifier, and signified are to be best taken advantage of to effect or enrich learning.
Presenter(s)
Katherine Watson, Coastline Community College, Fountain Valley, USA
Katherine WatsonDr. Katherine Watson has been teaching French, English, linguistics, anthropology, English as a Second Language, and zoosemiotics for more than four decades, at first in the traditional classroom, then at a distance and online. In addition, she translates and interprets literary and technical works and has trained interpreters for the soccer World Cup and the summer Olympics. Her papers and literary translations have been presented and published in the Usa and abroad. Dr. Watson began French in Action online with the Annenberg/CPB (Corporation for Public Broadcasting) Project and conceived/developed/taught in the Coast Community College District’s first completely-online course program.

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Measuring Online Course Design Quality with Open Resource Metrics

Audience
Novice
Session Description
As institutions of all types increase their online offerings, the process of creating courses, whether a new course or an online version of one that already exists in a face-to-face format, can be underestimated in terms of the time, resources, and expertise required. Adding time and expense related to acquiring and using quality measurement instruments is often not an option for design teams working with compressed schedules and limited budgets. Fortunately there are a number of existing guidelines made available via Creative Commons (CC) licenses and other open access methods. The purpose of this session is to create an awareness of open source quality metrics that can readily assist course designers and faculty in the online course design and development process.

Objectives will include: a.) an introduction of a short list of open access rubrics, matrices, and checklists currently used in higher education to guide the design and development of online courses, b.) a comparison of the open instruments, c.) discussion with participants on experiences with open access rubrics, and d.) recommendations for moving forward from the presenters.

Session attendees will be asked to share their concerns, experiences, and recommendations as they relate to quality measures in the context of online course design. Participants will also be encouraged to participate in session and conference backchannel communication through the use of Twitter and designated hashtags.

Presenter(s)
Melissa Venable, OnlineColleges.net, South Carolina, USA
Melissa_Venable_64Melissa A. Venable, PhD is an Education Writer for OnlineColleges.net where she authors the Inside Online Learning blog. Her writing stems from a professional background in higher education, which includes experience as an instructional designer, online instructor, career counselor, and academic advisor at a range of public, private, and for-profit institutions. She earned her doctorate in Curriculum and Instruction – Instructional Technology from the University of South Florida. Join Melissa on Twitter (https://twitter.com/Melissa_Venable) and Google+. 
(https://plus.google.com/+MelissaAVenable/posts)
Amy Hilbelink, Laureate, Florida, USA
Amys linked in imageAmy Hilbelink, PhD is the Executive Director of Program Design – Health Sciences, Human Services, and Public Policy & Administration at Laureate Education in the Product Strategy, Innovation, and Development (PSID) Group. Amy was the Assistant Vice Chancellor for Online Academic Operations at Education Management Corporation (EDMC), one of the largest providers of private post-secondary education in North America. She also held leadership roles in the areas of academic strategies and development as well as curriculum development at Kaplan University. She earned her PhD from the University of South Florida, in Tampa Florida. Her degree is in Curriculum and Instruction, with an emphasis in Instructional Technology in healthcare education. Amy’s background includes work within traditional and for-profit institutions of higher education. Research interests include online academic quality initiatives, change management, regional and programmatic accreditation, project development and management.
You can find Amy on Twitter (http://twitter.com/ahilbelink), at ahilbelink@gmail.com
And www.linkedin.com/in/amyhilbelink

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.

 

Engaging Students: Using Gamification to Engage the Online Learning Experience

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
Gamification is widely used in many corporations today to ‘engage’ their employees in meeting or exceeding sales and training goals. We will explore the use of gamification to optimize instructor engagement, enhance student community, and engage student’s interaction with challenging concepts in the online classroom.

The Gen Y and Gen Z learners expect courses to encourage them creatively, while promoting opportunities to think and analyze the content through the use of new technologies. Implementation of gamification in courses proves to re-energize learners, create healthy competition, and increase learning engagement, while at the same time, adding some excitement and fun to the online classroom. Online professors need to be aware of gamification and its impact on students to successfully facilitate and manage “gamified” courses.

Presenter(s)
  • Tina Serafini, Kaplan University, Clearfield, PA, USA
  • Risa Blair, Kaplan University, Miami, FL, USA

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.

 

Multiple Methods to maximize Student Engagement in Fully Web-Based Math Courses

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
Retaining students has always been a major problem in our university because of their family problems, works, weather, illness or other conflicts. These problems pose more challenges for mathematics instructors because of students’ poor attendance, high dropout, and insufficient preparation of high school graduates, and lack of motivation. In order to address such issues, we are currently developing an online model of teaching undergraduate mathematics that is purely learner-centered and it has synchronous and asynchronous communication and assessments systems. Our goal is to investigate how new technologies may significantly enhance dynamic learning environment, engage and motivate students, and help them in improving their learning and retention. These courses are delivered using Blackboard Learn as a course management system, supplemented with math oriented websites such as MyMahLab and webassign. In this presentation, we also look at how Wimba classroom, e-Board, application sharing with virtual graphic calculator, virtual tutorials, online discussion board, remotely proctored exams, recorded lessons and you tubes, MyMathLab, and webassign have improved student outcomes in our fully web-based math courses.
Presenter(s)
Om Ahuja
Om_Ahuja_64Dr. Om Ahuja is currently a tenured full Professor of Mathematics at Kent State University in U.S.A.. Earlier he served as an Associate Professor for about 13 years in six countries including U.S.A.. He Ahuja loves teaching and research in math, math education, and web education. His research interests include several areas in complex analysis, functional analysis, web-based education, and mathematics education. He has co-authored a graduate level textbook “Functional Analysis” by ‘Anshan New Age Science’ (ANS) (United Kingdom), and ‘New Age International (P) Limited, Publisher’. He has published over 110 papers in complex analysis and mathematics education. He has been an international visiting scholar at twenty-two universities in various countries including U.S.A, India, China, Turkey, and Malaysia. He has lectured or presented papers at over 85 national and international conferences and universities in several countries. Dr. Ahuja’s other international recognitions include serving as chief guest twice at two reputed universities in India and chief organizers of two national/international conferences in math and mathematics education.

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.

 

Human Touch = Engaged Online Students

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
Online instructors first need to be engaged if they want their students engaged. Learn how “human touch” serves to get everyone engaged.

Human touch is really all about creating and maintaining relationships. When students sense a trusting, caring relationship on the part of their instructor, students begin to perceive that their online experience is as much about them, or even more so, than the curriculum, projects, and test results. Students feel that their instructor is trying to establish a warm, supportive relationship, their sense of belonging and engagement increases. That’s just human nature.

The presentation will highlight examples of “human touch” in online courses, including those used by the presenter who has taught well over 100 undergraduate and graduate online college courses since 2000.

Presenter(s)
John Thompson, Buffalo State College, Buffalo, NY, USA
John ThompsonDr. John Thompson is Associate Professor Emeritus at Buffalo State College, Buffalo, NY, USA. He also operates his own educational consulting business – Global Learning Institute, Inc. Although retired, Dr. Thompson continues to teach 100% online courses for several institutions of higher education. He has taught some 150 online courses since 2000. He enjoys the flexibility of teaching online from his home office at all hours of the day and night. Dr. Thompson has chaired conferences, done presentation and paper reviews for numerous conferences and publications, made presentations at numerous local to international conferences, and has authored many publications in his field. Prior to working in higher education, his career experience included working in urban, suburban, and rural schools as an elementary and secondary classroom teacher (general education and special education), curriculum coordinator, principal, and school superintendent. He also functioned as director of training for two state governments and director of a university-based computer training organization.

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Developing Courses and Programs Using Open Education Resources: Challenges and Opportunities

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
The cost of a college degree in the United States has increased over 1000% in the past 30 years (Jamrisko & Kolet, 2012), with Americans currently spending an estimated $450 billion dollars each year for post-secondary education. For many, student loans have been the only way to keep up with the increasing cost, and student loan debt is now over $1 trillion dollars (Kavoussi, 2012). Recognizing the need to decrease costs where possible, many colleges have turned to open source content since over $12 billion dollars is spent each year for textbooks. Open educational resources (OER), such as learning management systems (for example Moodle), free or inexpensive online textbooks (bookboon, Flat World Knowledge), supplemental study materials or courses (MIT Open Courseware, Coursera, Khan Academy), word processing tools such as AbiWord , as well as full productivity suites such as OpenOffice and LibreOffice (Giza, 2009), indeed help reduce out of pocket expenses. Curating these resources, however, for course and/or program development – while presenting a wonderful opportunity, is not without its challenges.

This presentation will provide a balanced discussion and interactive session around the challenges and opportunities in developing courses and programs using OER’s.

References:
Giza, B. (2009). The use of free, open-source, and web-based tools in education. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (pp. 1838-1842). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Jamrisko, M, & Kolet, I. (2012, Aug 15). Cost of college degree in U.S. oars 12 fold: Chart of the day. http://www.bloomberg.com
Kavoussi, B. (2012 Mar 22) Student loan debt hits $1 trillion, deemed ‘too big to fail’ by one Federal agency. http:/www.huffingtonpost.com

Presenter(s)
Trevor Belcher, Ashford University, Bristol, VA, USA
Trevor BelcherDr. Trevor Belcher is an Assistant Professor in Ashford’s College of Health, Human Services, and Science, where he teaches undergraduate psychology courses such as Introduction to Psychology, Research Methods, and the Capstone course. He holds his PhD and MS in Psychology from Capella University and a BS with a double major in Ministry and Theology from Mid-America Christian University. Over most of the past two decades, his educational and practical experience has allowed him the opportunity to serve in various capacities such as pastoral ministry (ten years), counseling, teaching, and administration. “For the past eight years, I have had the privilege of working and teaching at the University level. I have enjoyed and learned from every class. I love working with students and helping to make a difference in someone’s life.” Dr. Belcher was born in Warren, MI, reared in Kentucky. And currently lives in Virginia. He has been married for over two decades and has one son. In his spare time, he enjoys movies, spending time with his family, and trying to learn guitar.
Patricia Neely, Bridgepoint Education, Richlands, VA, USA
Bio coming soon!
Jan Tucker, Higher Learning Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
Bio coming soon!

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.

 

Exploring a Graduate-Level Mobile Technologies Course

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
This presentation will explore two instructors’ experiences while teaching a new graduate-level mobile technologies course at a Midwest university. This blended course was designed to inform educators and professionals about mobile technologies for teaching and learning. The instructors will share various mobile technologies and discuss some of the benefits and limitations of these tools. Participants will be encouraged to share and contribute their own experiences and best practices with mobile technologies in the university classroom.

Interactivity
Through the use of synchronous tools including whiteboard, chat, and polling, participants will be encouraged to share and contribute their own experiences and best practices with mobile technologies in the online and/or face-to-face classroom. As one example, participants will be asked to brainstorm ideas for using various mobile applications and technologies and share with the rest of the group. The collection of resources shared during the session will then be available as a take-away resource for all participants.

Presenter(s)
Jeffrey Geronimo, Elmhurst College, Elmhurst, IL, USA
Bio coming soon!
Cindy York, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA
Bio coming soon!

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Teaching based augmented reality and smartphones to promote learning motivation among middle school students

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
Educators’ attitudes toward wireless devices are mixed. Some teachers perceive them as a distraction to the educational process while others report the benefits of wireless devices to the learning process.

The aim of this study was to examine the extent to which middle school students’ use of smartphones for teaching affects students’ motivation. Moreover, it explored students’ attitudes toward the implementation of smartphones in education: the types of usage they implement and suggest and whether they think that smartphones should be implemented in schools at all. Students were found to be highly motivated compared to the control group; they expressed willingness to conduct such activities in the future and said they would be excited to develop an activity of their own.

Presenter(s)
Tami Seifert, Kibutzim College of Education, Tel Aviv, Israel
Tami SeifertHead, Computing Education Department, Director of Graduate Teacher Training Program, Faculty of Education at Kibutzim College of Education, Israel.
Teaches courses on innovative technologies in education, distance education, mobile education, and implementation of social networks in education.
Teaches toward a specialization certificate of online teaching.
Vicky Tshuva-Albo, Kibutzim College of Education, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Bio coming soon!

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Inter-Cultural Online Collaboration

Audience
All Audiences
Session Description
This work focused on computer-mediated tutoring and its interaction with perceived cultural barriers. I was interested in how cultural background, cognitive load, and communicative involvement would interplay with a tutor’s instruction and a listener’s ease of comprehension. The results to this 5-experiment quantitative and qualitative study were quite complex, showing that users’ cognitive load threshold interacted with whether they perceived their conversational partner to be from the same or a different culture.

That is, those in the most difficult condition (challenging descriptions and perceived cross-cultural communication) actually put forth the least amount of effort of any group. Unsurprisingly, the difficulty manipulation in same-culture teacher/learner pairs caused the pairs to work harder. However, this same difficulty manipulation caused contrasting-cultural pairs to put forth less effort than those in the easy-manipulation group.

That is, when conversational participants were not from the same perceived cultural group, they did not try as hard in a difficult task. However, when they were in the same perceived cultural group, they did try harder in the harder task. Importantly, the cultural group manipulation was a deception, and all participants were from the same culture.

The findings of the study reiterate the well-established finding that Bruner’s scaffolding is indeed an important aspect of learning—when teachers and learners reach a load threshold, they will no longer be willing to try. The study also revealed interesting features of three theories of communication, which, at the time were thought to be at odds with each other. The dissertation showed that depending on the parameters of communicative setting, one or the other theory might be correct. The key parameters were cognitive load and perceived in-group/out-group status as manipulated by cultural preconceptions of the interlocutor (conversational partner).

One of these theories addressed in my work was Herbert Clark’s theory of common ground, whereby speakers and listeners try painstakingly to take each other’s perspectives into account. In this research, I demonstrate that such factors can amplify content difficulty, and need to be taken into consideration when determining how to scaffold tasks for learners.

Presenter(s)
  • Roxanne Raine, Hawaii Pacific University, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
Audience
Novice, Intermediate, Advanced, All Audiences

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Faculty Perceptions on the Benefits of Instructor Evaluation for Improved Online Facilitation.

Audience
Intermediate, Advanced
Session Description
This research study reviewed the Online Instructor Evaluation System (OIES) used by Park University’s Distance Learning program. The system is a peer/administrative means to evaluate adjunct instructors for effective online class facilitation. Online instructors who had been evaluated by the OIES were surveyed on their perspective of how the OIES impacted their online instruction. Both quantitative and qualitative results of the research survey indicated that online adjunct instructors perceived the OIES as a beneficial system to gauge and improve online facilitation.

Interactivity
Examples of the survey instrument and results will be proffered. As time allows, interactivity will include quizzing the audience members on their roles for their institutions, background in evaluation, and experiences with evaluation of online instructors.

Presenter(s)
Marthann Schulte, Park University, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
Marthann SchulteMarthann Schulte, PhD is an Associate Professor of Education at Park University, teaching and developing online courses for the graduate program in Adult Education. She is also the Coordinator of Online Faculty Evaluation and leads a team that oversees online instructor training, mentoring and evaluation. This evaluation team, which has created a number of unique, research based online training and evaluation programs, works with more than 500 online adjuncts per academic year. Marthann’s doctorate (PhD) is in Education, Curriculum and Instruction, from Kansas State University, where she focused on online learning and distance education modes. Marthann is a military spouse (Army) and works for Park University at a distance from Portsmouth, Virginia.

A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.

We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.

 

Produced by LearningTimes