A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
Objectives will include: a.) an introduction of a short list of open access rubrics, matrices, and checklists currently used in higher education to guide the design and development of online courses, b.) a comparison of the open instruments, c.) discussion with participants on experiences with open access rubrics, and d.) recommendations for moving forward from the presenters.
Session attendees will be asked to share their concerns, experiences, and recommendations as they relate to quality measures in the context of online course design. Participants will also be encouraged to participate in session and conference backchannel communication through the use of Twitter and designated hashtags.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.
The Gen Y and Gen Z learners expect courses to encourage them creatively, while promoting opportunities to think and analyze the content through the use of new technologies. Implementation of gamification in courses proves to re-energize learners, create healthy competition, and increase learning engagement, while at the same time, adding some excitement and fun to the online classroom. Online professors need to be aware of gamification and its impact on students to successfully facilitate and manage “gamified” courses.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.
Human touch is really all about creating and maintaining relationships. When students sense a trusting, caring relationship on the part of their instructor, students begin to perceive that their online experience is as much about them, or even more so, than the curriculum, projects, and test results. Students feel that their instructor is trying to establish a warm, supportive relationship, their sense of belonging and engagement increases. That’s just human nature.
The presentation will highlight examples of “human touch” in online courses, including those used by the presenter who has taught well over 100 undergraduate and graduate online college courses since 2000.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
This presentation will provide a balanced discussion and interactive session around the challenges and opportunities in developing courses and programs using OER’s.
References:
Giza, B. (2009). The use of free, open-source, and web-based tools in education. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (pp. 1838-1842). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Jamrisko, M, & Kolet, I. (2012, Aug 15). Cost of college degree in U.S. oars 12 fold: Chart of the day. http://www.bloomberg.com
Kavoussi, B. (2012 Mar 22) Student loan debt hits $1 trillion, deemed ‘too big to fail’ by one Federal agency. http:/www.huffingtonpost.com
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
Access/download any related materials/handouts
from this session by clicking the button on the right.
Interactivity
Through the use of synchronous tools including whiteboard, chat, and polling, participants will be encouraged to share and contribute their own experiences and best practices with mobile technologies in the online and/or face-to-face classroom. As one example, participants will be asked to brainstorm ideas for using various mobile applications and technologies and share with the rest of the group. The collection of resources shared during the session will then be available as a take-away resource for all participants.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
The aim of this study was to examine the extent to which middle school students’ use of smartphones for teaching affects students’ motivation. Moreover, it explored students’ attitudes toward the implementation of smartphones in education: the types of usage they implement and suggest and whether they think that smartphones should be implemented in schools at all. Students were found to be highly motivated compared to the control group; they expressed willingness to conduct such activities in the future and said they would be excited to develop an activity of their own.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
That is, those in the most difficult condition (challenging descriptions and perceived cross-cultural communication) actually put forth the least amount of effort of any group. Unsurprisingly, the difficulty manipulation in same-culture teacher/learner pairs caused the pairs to work harder. However, this same difficulty manipulation caused contrasting-cultural pairs to put forth less effort than those in the easy-manipulation group.
That is, when conversational participants were not from the same perceived cultural group, they did not try as hard in a difficult task. However, when they were in the same perceived cultural group, they did try harder in the harder task. Importantly, the cultural group manipulation was a deception, and all participants were from the same culture.
The findings of the study reiterate the well-established finding that Bruner’s scaffolding is indeed an important aspect of learning—when teachers and learners reach a load threshold, they will no longer be willing to try. The study also revealed interesting features of three theories of communication, which, at the time were thought to be at odds with each other. The dissertation showed that depending on the parameters of communicative setting, one or the other theory might be correct. The key parameters were cognitive load and perceived in-group/out-group status as manipulated by cultural preconceptions of the interlocutor (conversational partner).
One of these theories addressed in my work was Herbert Clark’s theory of common ground, whereby speakers and listeners try painstakingly to take each other’s perspectives into account. In this research, I demonstrate that such factors can amplify content difficulty, and need to be taken into consideration when determining how to scaffold tasks for learners.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.
Interactivity
Examples of the survey instrument and results will be proffered. As time allows, interactivity will include quizzing the audience members on their roles for their institutions, background in evaluation, and experiences with evaluation of online instructors.
A recording of this presentation is available.
Click the button to the right to access the session archive.
We invite you to join the discussion about this session
by clicking the button on the right.